Repeat Bankruptcy Filer Map

Where debtors file more than once, and how repeat filing patterns vary across 94 federal districts.

Prior filing rate

The first map shows the percentage of cases in each district where the debtor had at least one prior bankruptcy filing. A high prior filing rate suggests that debtors in that district are cycling through the system repeatedly, often without completing a plan.

Animated map of prior bankruptcy filing rates across all 94 federal judicial districts from 2008 to 2024, showing the percentage of new cases where the debtor had previously filed bankruptcy, ranging from under 10 percent to over 50 percent
Prior filing rate by federal district, animated 2008-2024. Percentage of cases where the debtor had at least one previous bankruptcy filing. Data: FJC Integrated Database.
Why repeat filing matters

Under 11 U.S.C. Section 1328(f), a debtor who received a Chapter 13 discharge within the past two years cannot receive another. Under Section 727(a)(8), a Chapter 7 discharge bars another for eight years. These waiting periods exist because Congress recognized that repeat filing without completion wastes court resources and harms debtors. The discharge bar screener checks these waiting periods automatically.

Repeat filing volume

The second map shows the absolute volume of repeat filings by district. Districts with both high filing volumes and high prior filing rates represent the largest concentrations of recycling debtors in the federal system.

Animated map of repeat bankruptcy filing volumes across all 94 federal judicial districts from 2008 to 2024, showing the total number of cases filed by debtors with prior bankruptcy history
Repeat filing volume by federal district, animated 2008-2024. Total cases filed by debtors with prior bankruptcy history. Data: FJC Integrated Database.

The volume map reveals that repeat filing is concentrated in a relatively small number of high-volume districts. These districts often share characteristics: high Chapter 13 filing rates, high dismissal rates, and attorney practices that file large numbers of cases with low completion rates. The pattern suggests a system that is cycling the same debtors through repeated filings rather than achieving lasting relief.

Why repeat filing rates vary so widely

The prior filing rate ranges from under 10% in some districts to over 50% in others. Several factors explain this variation. Districts with high Chapter 13 usage relative to Chapter 7 tend to have higher repeat filing rates, because Chapter 13 plans fail more often than Chapter 7 liquidations. When a Chapter 13 case is dismissed, the debtor's underlying debt remains, and many debtors refile to regain the protection of the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. Section 362.

Attorney practices also play a role. In districts where attorneys file large volumes of Chapter 13 cases with minimal client preparation, dismissal rates are higher, and the same clients return to file again. The prior filing rate in these districts reflects not just debtor behavior but systemic incentives: attorneys collect fees on each new filing, trustees administer each new case, and the court processes each new petition, whether or not the debtor has a realistic chance of completing a plan.

The cost of repeat filing

Each bankruptcy filing carries direct costs to the debtor: $338 in filing fees for Chapter 13, plus attorney fees that typically range from $2,500 to $5,000. A debtor who files three times has spent $1,014 in filing fees alone, plus potentially $7,500 or more in attorney fees, without receiving any debt relief. The indirect costs are harder to measure but equally real: months of wage garnishment through plan payments that are ultimately refunded when the case is dismissed, damage to credit reports from multiple filings, and the psychological toll of repeated failure.

For the court system, repeat filing consumes judicial resources. Each case requires a meeting of creditors under Section 341, plan review, and potentially hearings on confirmation and motions to dismiss. When a significant percentage of a district's caseload consists of repeat filers whose cases are likely to fail again, those resources are diverted from debtors who might benefit from the process.

Related maps

Federal Rules Committee

This research supports Suggestion 26-BK-3 to the Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy Rules

Proposing automated Section 1328(f) discharge bar screening in federal bankruptcy courts

This tool is free and open-source. Donations fund PACER access fees and our goal of forming a 501(c)(3) nonprofit for bankruptcy court transparency.

Support on Ko-fi

PACER cases made free through RECAP: 0 of 37.9 million

Every document we access becomes permanently free for the next researcher, attorney, or debtor.

$0 of $5,000 Q1 PACER research goal

1,500+ hours. No grants, no institutional backing. 0 supporters so far.

Fund this research