Section 109(g) is a federal law that bars you from filing any bankruptcy case for 180 days after a prior case is dismissed under certain conditions. Unlike discharge bars, which let you file but block debt relief, this provision blocks the door entirely -- no case is opened, no automatic stay takes effect, and no creditor protection begins.
Most bankruptcy timing restrictions are discharge bars -- they let you file a new case but prevent the court from eliminating your debts at the end. Section 109(g) is different. It is a filing bar: for 180 days after certain dismissals, you cannot file any bankruptcy petition at all. No case is opened, no automatic stay takes effect, and no creditor protection begins.
The statute targets two specific situations where Congress concluded a debtor had abused the bankruptcy process or was using voluntary dismissal to game the automatic stay.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, no individual ... may be a debtor under this title who has been a debtor in a case pending under this title at any time in the preceding 180 days if -- (1) the case was dismissed by the court for willful failure of the debtor to abide by orders of the court, or to appear before the court in proper prosecution of the case; or (2) the debtor requested and obtained the voluntary dismissal of the case following the filing of a request for relief from the automatic stay.
If the court dismisses your case because you willfully failed to follow court orders or failed to appear as required, you are barred from filing a new case for 180 days. The word "willful" is doing important work here -- the failure must be intentional or reflect a conscious disregard for the court's authority, not merely an oversight or mistake.
Common scenarios that trigger 109(g)(1):
Not every dismissal triggers the bar. If your case was dismissed for failing to complete credit counseling, missing a routine filing deadline, or other reasons not involving willful disobedience of court orders, Section 109(g)(1) does not apply.
If a creditor filed a motion asking the court to lift the automatic stay, and you then voluntarily dismissed your case, you are barred from refiling for 180 days. This provision targets a specific abuse pattern: filing bankruptcy solely to invoke the automatic stay and stop a foreclosure or repossession, then voluntarily dismissing once the immediate crisis passes, only to refile when the creditor tries again.
Two conditions must be met:
Courts are split on whether 109(g)(2) requires the voluntary dismissal to be caused by the stay relief motion, or whether timing alone is sufficient. The Tenth Circuit, in In re Frieouf, 938 F.2d 1099 (10th Cir. 1992), held that a causal connection is required -- the debtor must have dismissed the case because of the pending stay relief motion, not merely after it was filed. Other courts apply the statute more literally: if the sequence fits (stay relief motion filed, then voluntary dismissal), the bar applies regardless of the debtor's reasons for dismissing.
Under the Frieouf approach, if you can show your voluntary dismissal was unrelated to the creditor's stay relief motion -- for example, you dismissed because you found a non-bankruptcy solution to your debts -- the 180-day bar does not apply even though the timing overlapped.
Filing bars and discharge bars serve different purposes and operate at different points in the bankruptcy process. Confusing them is common, but the practical consequences are very different.
| Filing bar (109(g)) | Discharge bar (727(a), 1328(f)) | |
|---|---|---|
| What it blocks | Filing a new case | Receiving a discharge |
| Can you file? | No | Yes |
| Automatic stay? | No (no case exists) | Yes (case is filed) |
| Duration | 180 days | 2 to 8 years |
| Triggered by | Certain dismissals | Prior discharge |
| Statutes | 109(g) | 727(a)(8)/(9), 1328(f) |
| Measured from | Date of dismissal order | Filing date to filing date |
A discharge bar still lets you file and get the automatic stay -- temporary protection from creditors. A filing bar gives you nothing. You cannot file, you have no case, and creditors can pursue all available remedies. The filing bar is shorter (180 days vs. years), but it is more restrictive during the period it applies.
Even when the 180-day filing bar does not apply, serial bankruptcy filings trigger automatic stay limitations under Sections 362(c)(3) and 362(c)(4). These provisions, added by BAPCPA in 2005, apply whenever a debtor has had a prior case pending within the previous year:
| Situation | Statute | Stay duration |
|---|---|---|
| One prior case dismissed within past year | 362(c)(3) | 30 days (unless extended by court) |
| Two or more prior cases dismissed within past year | 362(c)(4) | No stay at all (unless imposed by court) |
The combination of 109(g) and the 362(c) limitations creates a graduated deterrent against serial filing. A debtor who has a case dismissed under 109(g) conditions faces 180 days with no ability to file. A debtor who manages to refile after one dismissal gets only 30 days of stay protection. A debtor whose second attempt is also dismissed and who files a third time gets no automatic stay whatsoever.
Serial filing to repeatedly invoke the automatic stay -- for example, filing to stop a foreclosure, getting dismissed, refiling to stop it again -- was the specific abuse pattern Congress targeted. Between the 109(g) filing bar and the 362(c) stay limitations, this strategy is now largely ineffective. A debtor who needs genuine bankruptcy relief should focus on filing one case and prosecuting it properly.
The 180-day filing bar applies only in the two situations described above. It does not apply to:
Most dismissals do not trigger the 109(g) filing bar. The provision targets willful defiance of court authority and strategic abuse of the automatic stay. If your case was dismissed for ordinary reasons -- you could not afford plan payments, missed a procedural deadline, or decided bankruptcy was not the right path -- you are generally free to refile immediately.
The 180-day period runs from the date the dismissal order is entered. Unlike discharge bars (which run filing date to filing date), the filing bar runs from the dismissal date. If your case was dismissed on January 1, you can file a new case on June 30 -- the 180th day.
Courts calculate the period using calendar days, not business days. Weekends and holidays count. There is no tolling provision -- the 180-day clock does not pause for any reason.
There is a long-standing circuit split on whether Section 109(g) is jurisdictional (meaning the court must enforce it on its own, even if no party raises it) or waivable (meaning it applies only if a creditor or the trustee objects).
Courts that treat 109(g) as jurisdictional will dismiss a case filed within the 180-day window even if no party objects. Courts that treat it as waivable will allow the case to proceed unless someone raises the issue. The practical effect: in some districts, a debtor who files during the bar period and faces no objection can proceed with the case; in others, the court will catch it and dismiss.
Whether 109(g) is treated as jurisdictional or waivable varies by circuit and even by individual judge. Before refiling after a dismissal that may trigger the bar, check how courts in your district handle the issue. Filing during the 180-day period in a jurisdiction that treats the bar as jurisdictional risks automatic dismissal and the costs associated with a second filing.
Section 109(g) is one piece of a larger eligibility framework. A debtor considering a new filing after a prior case should check all of the following:
Each restriction operates independently. You can pass one test and fail another. A debtor who clears the 109(g) filing bar may still be barred from discharge under 1328(f). A debtor who is eligible for discharge may still face a reduced automatic stay under 362(c)(3).
Check whether a prior case affects your eligibility to file or receive a discharge.
Use the Eligibility CheckerThis tool is free and open-source. Donations fund PACER access fees and our goal of forming a 501(c)(3) nonprofit for bankruptcy court transparency.
Support on Ko-fiPACER cases made free through RECAP: 0 of 37.9 million
Every document we access becomes permanently free for the next researcher, attorney, or debtor.
$0 of $5,000 Q1 PACER research goal
1,500+ hours. No grants, no institutional backing. 0 supporters so far.
Fund this research